Pages: [1] |
1. WTA: Erebus - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Bump for a nice ship. Hope you change your mind.
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.14 11:01:00
|
2. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Aequitas Veritas Edited by: Aequitas Veritas on 14/11/2009 10:17:06 How about: - Keep the EHP buff - Let it launch 20 drones (needs that for self protection against smaller ships) - Limit the bandwith so it can only laun...
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.14 10:48:00
|
3. [Petition ] Reverse changes to Supercarrier - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
/signed Keep our motherships the way they are.
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.14 04:04:00
|
4. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I appreciate that the developers are willing to listen and take suggestions. I also understand that the develops want to make some changes to these ships. But remember what these ships represent. Supercapitals are meant to be awe inspiring ships....
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.14 02:00:00
|
5. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
"Perhaps no ships in EVE symbolize the majesty of the game more than the Nyx, Wyvern, Aeon and Hel." "One side effect of this change is that the build cost for Supercarriers will go down slightly as they will no longer require the Capital Clone V...
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.13 09:44:00
|
6. [Issue] Fix Supercarriers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
/signed If you are going to go through with this change, I want to be able to get the minerals needed to build my Nyx before the patch back as components.
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.12 23:16:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
And for those people who keep saying that this is just another nerf. It is not. When heavy dictors got introduced, motherships went from 30+ bil to around 15 bil, but the build cost never changed. So why change it now?
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.12 23:10:00
|
8. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I find it hard to believe that these changes are going through. It is impossible to make everyone happy. Whenever something is changed in game, some people will benefit and some will suffer. That is just how a game like this works, and I accept it...
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.12 22:59:00
|
9. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You guys should really look into the remote ecm burst. In its current form, it is not that useful. You break someone's lock, but they can instantly relock. Would be nice if the mod works like a jammer and prevents other ships from being able to lo...
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.11.02 12:11:00
|
10. New Dev Blog: POS Exploit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
That was a very nice report. A lot of damage was done to this game when news of the exploit first came out. I'm glad to see CCP take such serious measures. Well done.
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.02.16 11:28:00
|
11. [Proposal] Buying SP`s with ISK. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Don't think this is a good idea. You can buy characters with isk.
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.01.27 13:15:00
|
12. Blog: The results are in; EVE and ShaderModel support - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I use my laptop often to change skills. Good move.
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2009.01.27 13:11:00
|
13. Question about faction standing - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
This might have been answered elsewhere, but I did a search and didn't find what I wanted, so here is the question: I'm rather new and have been running missions to make isk. I know you gain standing as you complete missions, but you also are loo...
- by Guterro d'Tefiane - at 2007.04.26 23:51:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |